تحلیل پدیدارشناسانه ادراک معلمان از ادغام چت جی پی تی در آموزش و پرورش مقطع ابتدایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، بیرجند، ایران

2 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

چکیده

هدف: با پیشرفت فناوری‌، ابزارهای نوینی مانند چت‌جی‌پی‌تی به سرعت جای خود را در حوزه آموزش باز کرده‌اند. هدف این پژوهش بررسی ادراکات معلمان دوره ابتدایی از ادغام چت‌جی‌پی‌تی در آموزش بود و تجربه زیسته آنان از فرصت‌ها، چالش‌ها و کاربردهای چت‌جی‌پی‌تی را بررسی نمود.
روش‌شناسی: طرح پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و از نوع پدیدارشناسی بود. با توجه به ماهیت پژوهش، از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از نوع معیار استفاده شد. پس از مصاحبه با 13 معلم، داده‌های اخذ شده به اشباع رسید. فرایند تحلیل داده‌ها بر اساس روش کلایزی، و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار MAXQDA2020 انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: تحلیل داده‌ها منجر به شناسایی ۲۱۱ عبارت معنی‌دار شد که در قالب ۲۵۲ واحد معنایی تدوین گردیدند. در نهایت، واحدهای معنایی مشابه در دسته‌های کلی‌تری طبقه‌بندی شده و یافته‌های پژوهش را شکل دادند که نشان‌دهنده‌۹ مضمون اصلی و 23 زیرمضمون بود. مضامین اصلی استخراج شده عبارت بودند از: افزایش کارایی، بهبود مهارت‌های فکری و شناختی، بهینه‌سازی فرآیند یادگیری، چالش‌های پاسخ‌دهی، چالش‌های اخلاقی و آموزشی معلمان، مسائل حریم خصوصی، تولید محتوا آموزشی، ارزشیابی کلاسی و راهنمایی و مشاوره.
نتیجه‌گیری و پیشنهادها:  چت‌جی‌پی‌تی فرصت ها و کاربردهای زیادی برای آموزش و پرورش مقع ابتدایی به ارمغان آورده‌ است. با این‌حال، معلمان با چالش‌هایی در این مسیر روبه رو هستند که ضروریست با ارائه راهنمایی‌های مناسب و دوره‌های آموزشی، توانمندی آن‌ها در بهره‌گیری از این فناوری افزایش یابد.
نوآوری و اصالت:  این پژوهش با رویکردی نو به ظرفیت‌های چت‌جی‌پی‌تی در برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی مقطع ابتدایی پرداخته و فرصت‌ها و کاربردهای این فناوری را که می‌توانند به بهبود فرایند آموزش کمک کنند، همراه با چالش‌های موجود در این مسیر بررسی کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Phenomenological Analysis of Primary School Teachers' Perception of ChatGPT Integration in Education

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Rostaminezhad 1
  • hasan khajeh 2
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Birjand, Iran
2 PhD Student, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Birjand, Iran
چکیده [English]

Aim: With technological advancements, innovative tools such as ChatGPT have rapidly found their place in the field of education. This study aimed to examine the perceptions of elementary school teachers regarding the integration of ChatGPT into education and explored their lived experiences concerning its opportunities, challenges, and applications.
Methodology: The research design was  qualitative approach with a phenomenological methodology. Given the nature of the study, criterion-based purposive sampling was employed. Data saturation was reached after conducting interviews with 13 teachers. The data analysis process was carried out using Colaizzi's method and facilitated by MAXQDA 2020 software.
Results: Data analysis led to the identification of 211 meaningful statements, which were organized into 252 semantic units. Ultimately, similar semantic units were categorized into broader themes, forming the study's findings. These findings revealed nine main themes and 23 subthemes. The extracted main themes included: increasing efficiency, enhancing cognitive and critical thinking skills, optimizing the learning process, response-related challenges, ethical and pedagogical challenges for teachers, privacy concerns, educational content creation, classroom assessment, and guidance and counseling.
Conclusions and suggestions: ChatGPT has brought numerous opportunities and applications for primary education. However, teachers face challenges along this path, making it essential to enhance their ability to utilize this technology through appropriate guidance and training programs.
Innovation and originality: This study adopts an innovative approach to exploring the potential of ChatGPT in educational planning at the elementary level. It examines the opportunities and applications of this technology that can contribute to improving the educational process, along with the challenges encountered along the way.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • ElementaryLevel
  • ChatGPT
  • Phenomenological
  • artificial intelligence
  • teacher perception
  • educational planning
Achiam, O.J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F.L., ... Zoph, B. (2024). GPT-4 Technical Report (arXiv:2303.08774). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774.
Ahmad, K., Iqbal, W., El-Hassan, A., Qadir, J., Benhaddou, D., Ayyash, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2024). Data-driven artifcial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3314610
Ahmadii, S., Tahmasebzadeh Sheikhlar, D., & Mirarab Razi, R. (2025). Analysis of the opportunities and challenges of personalized learning based on artificial intelligence in higher education. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 13(26), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2025.28091.2292 .
Amani, H., Matlabi Nezhad, A., Choupani, F., & Zarei Gachi, M. (2024). A systematic analytical review of the effects of GPT chatbot application in education. Technology and Knowledge Research in Education, 4(2), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.30473/t-edu.2024.70960.1136
Ayuso-Del Puerto, D., & Gutiérrez-Esteban, P. (2022). La Inteligencia Artificial como recurso educativo durante la formación inicial del profesorado. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32332
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
Bohara, D. K., & Rana, K. (2024). Unmasking teachers’ proficiency in harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) for transformative education. SN Social Sciences, 4(203). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-01003-7​:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Bozkurt, A., Junhong, X., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., et al. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18, 53–130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636568
Cain, W. (2024). Prompting change: Exploring prompt engineering in large language model AI and its potential to transform education. TechTrends, 68(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528- 023-00896-0
Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., Kajornmanee, T., & Chaipah, K. (2022). A personalized learning system-supported professional training model for teachers’ TPACK development. Computers and        Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article100064.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100064
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artifcial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chen, Y., & Esmaeilzadeh, P. (2024). Generative AI in medical practice: In-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e53008. https://doi.org/10.2196/53008
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artifcial intelligence in higher education: The state of the feld. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education20(22).https://doi.org/10. 1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33039.05283
Ellis, A. R., & Slade, E. (2023). A new era of learning: Considerations for ChatGPT as a tool to enhance statistics and data science education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2223609
Feng, S., & Law, N. (2021). Mapping artifcial intelligence in education research: A network-based keyword analysis. International Journal of Artifcial Intelligence in Education, 31(1), 277–303. https:// doi.org/10.1007/S40593-021-00244-4
Ferrara, E. (2023). GenAI against humanity: Nefarious applications of generative artificial intelligence and large language models. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4614223
Gasaymeh, A.-M. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024). University students’ insights of generative artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062.
Ghodrati, A., Kian, M., & Mahdavi Nasab, Y. (2025). Identifying digital professional competencies of teachers in the field of artificial intelligence application in education. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 13(26), 74-95. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2025.28512.2309
Grudin, J., Armour, P., Berghel, H., Charette, R. N., & King, J. L. (2023). ChatGPT and chat history: Challenges for the new wave. Computer, 56(5), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3255279
Gupta, M., Akiri, C., Aryal, K., Parker, E., & Praharaj, L. (2023). From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of generative AI in cybersecurity and privacy. IEEE Access, 11, 80218–80245. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.00691
Hamedinasab, S., & Rahimi, S. (2025). The barriers and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in higher education systems. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 13(26), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2025.28149.2295
Hashem, R., Ali, N., El Zein, F., Fidalgo, P., & Abu Khurma, O. (2024). AI to the rescue: Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a teacher ally for workload relief and burnout prevention. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19023
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In Data ethics: Building trust: How digital technologies can serve humanity (pp. 621–653). https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023b). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Karaman, M. R., & Göksu, İ. (2024). Are lesson plans created by ChatGPT more effective? An experimental study. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.607
Kehoe, F. (2023). Leveraging generative AI tools for enhanced lesson planning in initial teacher education at post primary. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.124
Kong, S. C., Yang, Y., & Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328​:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}.
Lampou, R. (2023). The integration of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and challenges. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4(15), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v4i00.15
Lo, C. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Manczka, J. (2024). A phenomenological study: Teacher perceptions of generative artificial intelligence and its impact on teaching and learning in high schools (Doctoral dissertation). Point Park University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Nguyen, T. H. B., & Tran, T. D. H. (2023). Exploring the efcacy of ChatGPT in language teaching. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2314210
Noboa Torres, M. L. N., Guevara, C., Ribadeneira Pazmiño, D. A., & Avalos Espinoza, D. P. (2024). Predictive Model to Evaluate University Students' Perception and Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence. Universidad Estatal de Bolívar. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Park, J., & Choo, S. (2024). Generative AI prompt engineering for educators: Practical strategies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 0(0), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241298954
Pesovski, I., Santos, R., Henriques, R., & Trajkovik, V. (2024). Generative AI for customizable learning experiences. Sustainability, 16(7), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073034
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of applied learning and teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10. 37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Shaw, D., Morfeld, P., & Erren, T. (2023). The (mis)use of ChatGPT in science and education. EMBO Reports, 24(7), e57501. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202357501
Şimşek, N. (2024). Integration of ChatGPT in mathematical story-focused 5E lesson planning: Teachers and pre-service teachers’ interactions with ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13258-x
Strzelecki, A. (2023). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovations in Higher Education, 49, 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Waltzer, T., Cox, R. L., & Heyman, G. (2023). Testing the ability of teachers and students to differentiate between essays generated by ChatGPT and high school students. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1923981
Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy, and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F (2019) Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? Int J Educational Technol High Educ 16(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artifcial Intelligence, 2, 100025.                                                        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021. 100025
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(5783). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0473.v1
Aguiar, J. J. B. (2024). ChatGPT as an educational support tool: An analysis of its potential in the teaching and learning process. Caderno Pedagógico, 21(2), e2660. https://doi.org/10.54033/cadpe dv21n2-019