آسیب‌شناسی دوره‌های ضمن خدمت کوتاه‌مدت بر اساس مدلCIPP ؛ ارائه راهکارهای مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی در چارچوب برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد مدعو دانشگاه فرهنگیان استان گلستان

2 مدرس دانشگاه فرهنگیان- استان مازندران

چکیده

هدف: این پژوهش به بررسی و آسیب‌شناسی دوره‌های ضمن خدمت کوتاه‌مدت معلمان از منظر برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی و بر مبنای مدل ارزشیابی CIPP (زمینه، درونداد، فرایند، و محصول) می‌پردازد. علاوه بر این، با به‌کارگیری فناوری هوش مصنوعی، راه‌کارهای ابتکاری برای بهبود اثربخشی این دوره‌ها فراهم می‌آورد.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش با بهره‌گیری از روش پیمایشی انجام شده و داده‌ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته جمع‌آوری شده‌اند. جامعه آماری معلمانی را شامل می‌شود که در دوره‌های ضمن خدمت سال­های 1399 تا 1401 شرکت کرده اند. نمونه با روش تصادفی طبقه‌بندی انتخاب و با استفاده از تحلیل‌های آماری تجزیه و تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که عوامل محدودکننده اثربخشی این دوره‌ها شامل عدم تناسب محتوا با نیازهای واقعی معلمان، ضعف در نیازسنجی و نبود نظارت مستمر است. به‌کارگیری هوش مصنوعی در برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی می‌تواند با تسهیل نیازسنجی دقیق، بهینه‌سازی محتوای آموزشی و ارائه بازخوردهای آنی، اثربخشی دوره‌ها را بهبود بخشد.
نتیجه‌گیری و پیشنهادها:  پیشنهاد می‌شود که دوره‌های آموزشی با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی و بر اساس نیازهای واقعی معلمان طراحی شوند. همچنین، ایجاد یک پلتفرم دیجیتال برای منتورینگ و کوچینگ و یک مرکز تخصصی با مدل یادگیری ترکیبی می‌تواند به معلمان در یادگیری مداوم و دسترسی به محتوای به‌روز کمک کند. این یافته‌ها مدیران آموزشی را به استفاده از فناوری‌های نوین در برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی برای افزایش اثربخشی دوره‌های ضمن خدمت ترغیب می‌کند.
نوآوری و اصالت:  این پژوهش با استفاده از مدل CIPP و فناوری هوش مصنوعی، به شیوه‌ای نوآورانه به ارزیابی و بهبود اثربخشی دوره‌های ضمن‌خدمت معلمان پرداخته و چارچوبی نظام‌مند برای شناسایی نیازهای آموزشی و بهینه‌سازی برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی ارائه داده است

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Short-Term In-Service Training Courses Based on the CIPP Model؛ Providing AI-Based Solutions within the Framework of Educational Planning

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedeh Homa Aghili 1
  • omollbanin ahmadihaji 2
1 Visiting professor at Farhangian University of Golestan province
2 University Lecturer, Farhangian University - Mazandaran
چکیده [English]

Aim: This research examines and diagnoses short-term in-service teacher training courses from the perspective of educational planning and based on the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, and Product). In addition, by utilizing artificial intelligence technology, it provides innovative solutions to improve the effectiveness of these courses.
Methodology: This study was conducted using a survey method, and the data were collected through a researcher-designed questionnaire. The statistical population consists of teachers who participated in in-service training programs from 2020 to 2022. The sample was selected using a stratified random sampling method, and the data were analyzed using statistical analyses.
Results: The results showed that the factors limiting the effectiveness of these courses include the mismatch between the content and the actual needs of teachers, weaknesses in needs assessment, and the lack of continuous supervision. The use of artificial intelligence in educational planning can enhance the effectiveness of these courses by facilitating accurate needs assessment, optimizing educational content, and providing real-time feedback.
Conclusions and suggestions: It is suggested that training courses be designed using artificial intelligence and based on the actual needs of teachers. Additionally, the creation of a digital platform for mentoring and coaching, along with a specialized center using a blended learning model, could assist teachers in continuous learning and accessing up-to-date content. These findings encourage educational managers to utilize modern technologies in educational planning to enhance the effectiveness of in-service training courses.
Innovation and originality: This research, by utilizing the CIPP model and artificial intelligence technology, innovatively evaluates and improves the effectiveness of in-service teacher training courses, providing a systematic framework for identifying educational needs and optimizing educational planning.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • In-Service Teacher Training؛ CIPP Evaluation Model؛ Higher Education؛ Artificial Intelligence
  • Educational planning؛ qualitative research؛ policymaking
Abuhmaid, A. (2011). ICT training courses for teacher professional development in Jordan. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/53347/.
Agrati, L. S. (2021). Systematic reviews on in-service training effectiveness: A prior comparative analysis of the used terms. Education and Self Development, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.3.14.
Asad, Z., & Javed, F. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of in-service training programs for enhancing teaching skills of ESL teachers at higher education level: Teachers' perceptions and experiences. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 10(1), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass.v10i1.367.
Asghar, M. Z. (2022). Evaluation of in-service vocational teacher training program: A blend of face-to-face, online and offline learning approaches. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/350217.
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. DigitalCommons@URI, University of Rhode Island, 1-15. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548.
Arslan, S., Mirici, İ. H., & Öz, H. (2020). Implementation and evaluation of an EFL teacher training program for non-formal education settings. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 19(3), 1337–1370. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.729666.
Basaran, M., Dursun, B., Gur Dortok, H. D., & Yilmaz, G. (2021). Evaluation of preschool education program according to CIPP model. Pedagogical Research, 6(2), em0091. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9701.
Cleary, T. J., Kitsantas, A., Peters-Burton, E., Lui, A., McLeod, K., Slemp, J., & Zhang, X. (2021). Professional development in self-regulated learning: Shifts and variations in teacher outcomes and approaches to implementation. Elsevier Ltd. 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103619.
Dai, Y. (2023). Negotiation of epistemological understandings and teaching practices between primary teachers and scientists about artificial intelligence in professional development. Research in Science Education, 53, 577-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10072-8.
Gochhayat, L., & Das, S. R. (2023). Beyond the classroom walls: Leveraging technology and artificial intelligence for continuous teacher professional development in the modern era. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Technology (pp. 659-669). ISBN: 978-93-34012-77-4
Hasanah, R. Z. (2023). Input evaluation in the implementation of the in-service teacher professional education curriculum. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Teacher Training & Education Faculty, Universitas Serambi Mekkah. https://doi.org/10.32672/pice.v2i1.1393.
Jarrahi, M. H., Askay, D., Eshraghi, A., & Smith, P. (2023). Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI. Business Horizons, 66(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.03.002.
Kasmaini, Hamzah, S., & Winarto, H. (2023). CIPP evaluation model: Online in-service teachers training program conducted at English language education study program of Bengkulu University. English Franca: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.5871.
Khaksar, M., Kiany, G. R., & ShayesteFar, P. (2023). Using a CIPP-based model for evaluation of teacher training programs in private-sector EFL institutes. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 38, 65–91. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.38.04.
Keskin, İ., & Yazar, T. (2020). Evaluation of the curriculum of high school mathematics according to CIPP model. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(3), 183–214. DOI:10.18009/jcer.740113.
Kivirand, T., Leijen, Ä., Lepp, L., & Tammemäe, T. (2021). Designing and implementing an in-service training course for school teams on inclusive education: Reflections from participants.  https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040166.
Khoshkab, S. (2023). Identifying and validating the themes of development of group and organizational qualifications in faculty members. Educational Planning Studies, 11(22), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.22080/EPS.2023.23868.2129. [In Persian]
Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers' teaching and students' learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 929175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929175.
Meng, P. (2024). An AI-enhanced teaching model using a novel deep learning approach. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2024.012.
Mena-Guacas, A. F., Chacon, M. F., Munar, A. P., Ospina, M., & Agudelo, M. (2023). Evolution of teaching in short-term courses: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9, e16933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16933.
Molefi, R. R., Ayanwale, M. A., Kurata, L., & Chere-Masopha, J. (2024). Do in-service teachers accept artificial intelligence-driven technology? The mediating role of school support and resources. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100191. DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100191.
Msamba, E. M., Msuya, E. A., & Anangisye, W. A. L. (2023). The impact of in-service education and training on teachers' learning: Perspectives from English foreign language teachers in Tanzania. Education Research International, Volume 2023, Article ID 6135444. DOI:10.1155/2023/6135444.
Qaisra, R., & Haider, S. Z. (2023). The influence of in-service teacher training programs on the professional development of school teachers. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.1101.0368.
Sanati, Z., Pashaei, A., Hassani, M., & Nejad Mohammad, V. (2024). Factors affecting the implementation of quality assurance programs in higher education. Educational Planning Studies, 12(23), 210-225. [In Persian] 10.22080/eps.2024.26466.2234.
Schmid, R. F., Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R. M., Pickup, D. I., & Abrami, P. C. (2023). A meta-analysis of online learning, blended learning, the flipped classroom and classroom instruction for pre-service and in-service teachers. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100142. DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142.
Sha, R. N. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in employee training and development. Mathematical Modeling and Algorithm Application, 1(1), Ulaanbaatar Erdem University. https://doi.org/10.54097/gg5eemnb.
Tammets, K., & Ley, T. (2023). Integrating AI tools in teacher professional learning: A conceptual model and illustrative case. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1255089. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1255089.
Tufail, M., Ishfaq, U., Tahir, T., & Muqqadar, L. (2023). Comparative analysis of induction program by using CIPP model: Perceptions of professional and non-professional teachers. Russian Law Journal, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i2.2199.
Yangyang, W. (2023). Teaching ability, performance and professional development among artificial intelligence Chinese professors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 35-45. DOI:10.1344/der.2024.45.151-157.