طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی دانشگاه تحول‌گرا؛ پیشایندها، فرایندها و پسایندها (مورد مطالعه: دانشگاه فرهنگیان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل.

2 دانشیار گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل.

3 استاد گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل

4 دانشیار گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل،ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی دانشگاه فرهنگیان تحول گرا و پیشایندها، فرایندها و پسایندهای آن انجام شده است. روش پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت آمیخته اکتشافی بوده است. در رویکرد کیفی از روش تحقیق گراندد تئوری و در مرحله کمّی از روش همبستگی و مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. ابتدا در مجموع 16 نفر از اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان کشور با روش نمونه‌گیری نظری بمورد مصاحبه قرار گرفتند. جامعه آماری بخش کمّی پژوهش شامل 750 عضو هیئت علمی بود که با استفاده از جدول مورگان، 255 نفر نمونه به روش تصادفی خوشه ای چندمرحله ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در مطالعه کیفی مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود. در مطالعه کمّی از پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته استفاده شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده های بخش کیفی با تکنیک کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی و بخش کمّی به روش مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری انجام شده است. بر اساس تکنیک کدگذاری 98 مورد واحد معنایی (کدباز) 9 مقوله با 3 تم اصلی(پیشایندها، فرایندها و پسایندها) دانشگاه تحول گرا شناسایی و نام گذاری شدند که بر اساس نظر متخصصان حوزه آموزش عالی تأیید شدند. در مرحله کمّی نیز نتایج تحقیق نشان داد پیشایندهای دانشگاه تحول گرا مشتمل بر خط مشی گذاری و خصوصیات دانشگاهی تاثیر معناداری بر فرآیندهای دانشگاه تحول گرا (علم گرایی، حرفه ای‌بودن و رهبری تحول‌گرا) دارد و همچنین نتایج نشان داد فرآیندهای دانشگاه تحول گرا تاثیر معناداری بر پسایندهای دانشگاه تحول‌گرا شامل تحول آفرینی، امکانات و ساختار، منابع انسانی و پیامدهای فردی و جامعه) دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and Validating of Transformational University Model: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences (Case Study: Farhangian University)

نویسندگان [English]

  • soraya jabbari 1
  • Mehdi Moeinikia 2
  • Adel Zahed Babelan 3
  • Husein Taqavi 4
1 PhD Candidate, Department of Education, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, I.R.I.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Education, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, I.R.I.
3 Professor, Department of Education, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, I.R.I.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Education, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, I.R.I.
چکیده [English]

The present study aims to design and validate the transformational university model; with the antecedents, processes and consequences being carried out at Farhangian University in Iran. The research was practical in its purpose and mixed exploratory (qualitative-quantitative) in its nature. The Grounded theory research method was used in qualitative approach to develop a conceptual model based on the perceptions of the university’s faculty members, while the structural equation method was used in the quantitate stage. A total of 16 faculty members from Farhangian University were selected through purposeful sampling and interviewed, considering the principles of saturation and maximum variation. Data analysis in the qualitative stage was done through open, axial, and selective coding techniques, and while SPSS 26 and LISREL software were used in the quantitative stage.
The results showed that, based on the coding of 98 semantic units (open code), 9 categories with 3 main themes (antecedents, processes, and consequences) of the transformational university were identified and named, which were confirmed through the opinions of higher education experts. In the quantitative stage, the research indicated that the antecedents of the transformational university had a significant impact on the processes of the transformational university (scientism, professionalism, and transformational leadership). The results also showed that the processes of the transformational university have a significant effect on the consequences of the transformational university (creating transformation in the university, facilities and structure, human resources, and individual and community consequences).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mixed Method
  • Transformational University
  • Farhangian University
  • Teacher Training
  • Ahanchian, M. R. (2013). Academic bureaucracy, issues and challenges. Iran's higher education, 5 (4), 1-22. Retrieved 12 march 2020 from: http://ihej.ir/article-۱-۵۸۴-fa.html (In Persian).
  • Ali Mohammadi Madanavi, S., Ahmadi, A., & Moazzami, M. (2021). Proposing a futures research model based on transformational leadership style: An approach to the development of entrepreneurial universities. Educational Development of Judishapur, 12(3), 837-848 . (In Persian).
  • Andam, R., khachian, A., & Asgari, M. (2015). Effective factors on change management at physical education faculty. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 3(2), 7-20 (In Persian).
  • Anderson, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in education: A review of existing literature. International Social Science Review, 93(1), 1-13.
  • Banmairuroy, W., Kritjaroen, T., & Homsombat, W. (2022). The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation's component factors: Evidence from Thailand’s new S-curve industries. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(3), 200-209.
  • Beverborg, A. O. G., Sleegers, P. J., & Van Veen, K. (2015). Fostering teacher learning in VET colleges: Do leadership and teamwork matter? Teaching and teacher education, 48, 22-33.
  • Burke, W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
  • Chawla, S., & Lenka, U. (2015). A study on learning organizations in Indian higher educational institutes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(2), 142–161.
  • Chong, S. (2014). Academic quality management in teacher education: a Singapore perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 22 (1), 53-64.
  • Hainun, R., Hasibuan, M., & Qurniati, A. (2022). The Effect of Principal's Transformational Leadership on Increasing Teacher Professionalism. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(1), 173-177.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. McGraw Hill.
  • Kazak, E. (2021). A conceptual analysis of the role of knowledge management in knowledge leadership. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(3), 352-372.
  • Khalil K. (2009). Structural Equation modeling in socio - economic research (with lisrel and simplis software). Tehran, Farhang Saba (In Persian).
  • Khanifar, H. (2009) Basics of the fundamental transformation of the education system. Secretariat of the Supreme Council of Education (In Persian).
  • Luyten, H., & Bazo, M. (2019). Transformational leadership, professional learning communities, teacher learning and learner centred teaching practices; Evidence on their interrelations in Mozambican primary education. Studies in educational evaluation, 60, 14-31.
  • Mehrmohammadi M. (2014). Teacher Education Curriculum and Its Collaborative Implementation Model: A Transformative Strategy for Teacher Education in Iran. CSTP; 1 (1) :5-26. Retrieved 20 may 2021 from: http://cstp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1848-fa.html (In Persian).
  • Moghali, A., Darvish, H., abbasi, N., & Mohammadi, F. (2016). Study and Ranking the Factors Influencing on Transformational Organization Model In Fars Education Organization(Case Study: Fars province education organization). Public Management Researches, 9(31), 29-50(In Persian).
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy; Committee on Responsible Science(2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); Foundations of Integrity in Research: Core Values and Guiding Norms. Retrived 16 may 2022 from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK475948/
  • Pawłowski, K. (2009). The ‘fourth generation university’as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 51-64.
  • Ronald, B., & Marc, L. (2021). The leadership challenge in times of the COVTD 19 pandemic-An empirical investigation on the impact of transformational leadership on motivation and team performance. Advances in Management, 14(3), 1-21.
  • Rukspollmuang, C. (2014). Comparative and International Education Implications for the Policy and Practice of Teacher Education and the Teaching Profession. Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2014 (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 25), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 73-85
  • Saafi, A. (2019). Hundred Years of Teacher Training in Iran: Opportunities, Threats, and Future Outlook. QJOE, 35 (2) :83-106 (In Persian).
  • Sadeq-zada Qamsari, A., Hanifa-zada, S. (2021). The Methodological Explanation and Critique of the Process of the Conceptual Analysis of Education in the Research Entitled "An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education in the Islamic Republic of Iran". Journal of Islamic Education, 16(36), 7-37 (In Persian).
  • Safi, A. (2000). Organization and laws of education in Iran. Tehran, SAMT (In Persian).
  • Samari, I.; Yemeni Dozi Sorkhabi, M.; Salehi Imran, I.; Grainejad, Gh. (2014). Investigating and identifying factors affecting the process of academic development in Iran's public universities. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 2(4), 67-100 (In Persian).
  • Sihombing, M. (2020). The Effect of Transformational Leadership, Work Discipline, and Satisdaction on Lecturers’ Performance at the Tarbiyah and Teaching Faculty of UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Journal of K6 Education and Management, 3(2), 100-108.
  • Supermane, S. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovation in teaching and learning activities: The mediation effect of knowledge management. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(4), 242-250.
  • Supermane, S., Tahir, L. M., & Aris, M. (2018). Transformational leadership in teacher education. International Journal of academic Research in Business and social Sciences, 8(3), 267-275.
  • Udin, U., & Shaikh, M. (2022). Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: Testing the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing and Work Passion. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), 13(1), 146-160.