بررسی نقش تعاملی دانشگاه و شهرداری در ایجاد و توسعه شهر یادگیرنده از منظر برنامه-ریزی آموزشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

3 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

4 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز،اهواز، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر باهدف طراحی الگوی برای ایجاد شهر یادگیرنده با محوریت دانشگاه در کلان‌شهر اهواز از منظر برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی انجام‌شده است. این پژوهش از نوع مطالعات کیفی به روش داده بنیاد است. جامعۀ آماری شامل استادان دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز و کارشناسان و مدیران شهرداری کلان‌شهر اهواز بوده و روش نمونه‌گیری به‌صورت هدفمند و گلوله برفی تا جایی ادامه یافت که پژوهشگر با استفاده از مصاحبۀ نیمه ساختاریافته با 23 نفر از اعضای نمونه به اشباع نظری رسید. تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از رویه های نظام مند کوربین و اشتراوس انجام شد که شامل کدگذاری مفاهیم و شکل دادن به نظریه است. تعداد 834 کدباز استخراج و از تلفیق آن‌ها تعداد 38 مقوله احصاء گردید.طی سه مرحلۀ کدگذاری باز، کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری انتخابی، الگوی ایجاد شهر یادگیرنده با محوریت دانشگاه در شش مقولۀ اصلی ایجاد شهر یادگیرنده (شرایط علی، پدیدۀ محوری، شرایط زمینه‌ای، شرایط مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدهای) ارائه‌شده است. این الگوی طراحی‌شده می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک الگوی راهبردی و یا عملیاتی در شهرداری کلان‌شهر اهواز مورداستفاده قرار گیرد.
نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، پیامدهای ایجاد شهر یادگیرنده درنتیجه تعامل دانشگاه و شهرداری، رشد و بلوغ اجتماعی شهروندان، تناسب توزیع خدمات آموزشی با توزیع جمعیت شهری، توسعه فعالیتهای آموزشی و تعاملات فرهنگی در شهر، توسعه انجمن‌ها و شبکه‌های علمی_فرهنگی، تصمیم‌گیری‌های علمی و مطلوب‌تر در سطح شهر، افزایش تعاملات دانشگاه و شهرداری، ،تعالی فضا و منظر شهری و توسعه فضای یادگیری، ایجاد ضمانت ارائه پیوست آموزش شهروندی برای همه پروژه‌های شهر یادگیرنده، افزایش تعاملات شهرداری در سطح ملی و بین‌المللی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the interactive role of university and municipality in creating and developing a learning city from the perspective of educational planning

نویسندگان [English]

  • Farzaneh Ghasemi 1
  • Abdollah Parsa 2
  • Yadollah mehralizadeh 3
  • Sakineh Shahi 4
1 PhD student, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology , Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Education, education and psychology, Shahid Chamran university of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology , Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology , Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study aimed at designing a model for developing a learning city with focus on university in metropolis city of Ahvaz from the perspective of educational planning. The research is based on the Grounded theory. The statistical population included faculty members of Shahid Chamran University and Ahwaz municipality managers and sampling was purposeful and snow ballets till the researcher after interviewing 23 samples reached a saturated decision. With analyzing the data of the interviews, 834 open codes extracted that from combination of them, 38 categories developed and after 3 steps of open coding, axial coding and selective coding, learning city model with focus on university with six main categories (condition of creation, phenomenon aligned, background conditions, modeling condition, strategies and consequences) presented. The designed model could be used as a strategic or operational model in municipality of Ahvaz city. Based on the data of this research, consequences of collaboration of municipality and university could be define as follows: social growth and maturating of the citizens, developing of social urban activities, increasing of cultural and scientific associations, improving urban decisions,upgrading of university and municipality cooperation, Appropriateness of the distribution of educational services with the distribution of the urban population, innovation in urban views and perspective and making necessary to providing tutorials for any projects in the learning city and improving the municipality collaboration in national and international levels.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • learning city
  • University
  • Municipality
  • Ahvaz
  • Grounded Theory

Extended abstract

Introduction

With the development of learning at the beginning of the 21st century, the world finds itself in the midst of dramatic changes in which the world's cities are in the center of these changes in the learning process (Jane, 2005). In international and practical studies, special focus has been placed on cities. In this regard, different perspectives and approaches of different dimensions have emerged in the framework of cities. These include: from an environmental point of view, concepts such as green and clean cities; as for the development and growth of technology, concepts such as electronic, virtual, digital, and information cities; as for the human factor, concepts such as the city of knowledge, city of learners, and city of creativity, which were introduced and considered by researchers, experts and policy makers. Faris (2006) identifies the global movement of "learning cities" as one of the growing views among many of such perspectives. According to the manifesto of the UNESCO International Conference on Learning City (2015), a learning city is considered a city that effectively mobilizes its resources in all sectors in a way that enhances inclusive learning from basic to advanced levels, facilitates learning in families, communities and in the workplace; develops the application of modern learning technologies and, while increasing the quality and benefits of learning, fosters a culture of lifelong learning. By doing so, the learning city will create and strengthen personal growth and social cohesion, social and cultural development, and sustainable development. In this manifesto, the key features of learning cities are expressed in three broad components: "The main benefits of creating a learning city, the main dimensions of creating a learning city and the underlying conditions for creating a learning city". In a learning city, there is extensive and lifelong learning, and cooperation and interaction is the most essential factor in connecting all its components. Meanwhile, Longworth and Davies (1996) argue that universities, as global organizations at the heart of the learning revolution, are the ideal places to play the leadership role of the learning city. From a regional development perspective, Goddard and Chatterton (1999) also emphasized the important role of universities in building a learning area. Morgan (2002) also pointed out to the pivotal role of universities as network catalysts in building social capital. Although many features of the learning city are common to all cities, they differ in ethnic and cultural composition, social structures, and cultural heritage (UNESCO, 2015). In light of this insight and given the important role of the university, it is necessary to design a systematic conceptual framework based on theoretical foundations appropriate to the ecological conditions of Ahvaz City to be used as a strategic or operational model. Therefore, the current question is how the municipality as an organization with different functions in the city on the one hand and universities as scientific and cultural institutions on the other hand, can cooperate and interact to create and develop the learning city? And in general, what is the interactive role of the university and the municipality in creating and developing the learning city from the perspective of educational planning?

Method

This research is a qualitative study based on the Grounded theory. The study cohort consisted of faculty members of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz and experts and managers of Ahvaz metropolitan municipality. We considered a systematic sampling method based on the snow ball effect so much so that the researchers reached a theoretical satisfaction after interviewing 23 respondents.  Data was analyzed based on continuous immersion, classification, coding and comparison tactics in three stages of open, axial and selective coding. The reliability of the interviews was assessed through the criteria of credibility, dependability, confirmability, and Lincoln and Cuba verification.

Results

By analyzing the content of the interviews, 834 open codes were extracted and combined in order to arrive at 38 categories. Through three stages of coding, the model of creating and developing the learning city with the cooperation and interaction of university and municipality (context, central category, causal conditions, intervening conditions, strategies and consequences) is presented. The results are presented in Figure 1.

Discussion

In interaction with the municipality, the university can engage in the following activities to facilitate the development and institutionalization of the learning city in the metropolis of Ahvaz. These include reviving municipal protocols with the help of university departments, using the capacities of student societies and talented students at the local level to carry out educational activities, setting up science houses and simplifying science for citizens, designing and producing educational and learning content (for citizens and employees of organizations), utilizing the dissertations of the universities of the region for conducting municipal study projects, establishing a center for approving urban implementation plans consisting of scientific experts of executive institutions and the university, using the scientific and intellectual capacities of the university in designing, consulting, monitoring and evaluating the learning city project and launching joint working groups and the think tanks of the academicians and city managers. These findings are in accord with the works of Goddard and Chatterton 1999; Morgan, 2002; Longworth, 2006; Regional Cooperation and Development Organization, 2007; Pascal International Observatory, 2014; Bayat et al., 2012; Sarvar et al., 2016.

Funding: There is no funding support.

Authors’ Contribution: Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work

Conflict of Interest: Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments: We are grateful to all the persons for scientific consulting in this paper.

Abdollahi, A., & Solaymani, D. M. (2018). Analysis of distribution of population and services in Ahwaz by Hybrid models.Territory, 15(58), 83-99
Chambers, J. (2010). The learning society. CICO Systems.Inc.
Delanty, G. (2003). Ideologies of knowledge society and cultural. Contradiction of higher education. Policy of Futures in Education, Vol 11 (1): 71- 82.
Di Sivo, M. & Ladiana, D. (2010). Towards a learning City the neighborhood lab and the lab net. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences2(2), 5349-5356.
Dohmen, G. (1996). Lifelong learning. Guidelines for a modern education policy. Bonn: Federal Ministry for Education, Science. Research and technology .
Duke, CH. (2002). Managing the learning university. USA: SRHE and Open University Press.
Facer, K. & Buchczyk, M. (2019). Towards a research agenda for the ‘actually existing’Learning City. Oxford Review of Education, 45:2, 151-167
Faris, R.) 2006(. Learning Cities: Lesson Learned, in Support of Vancouver Learning city Initiative” http://www.members.shaw.ca
Goddard, J.B. Chatterton, C. (1999). Regional Development Agencies and the knowledgeeconomy: harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. vol. 17 pp.685-699.
Hartley, D. (2000). Realizing the University in An Age of Supercomplexity. Journal of Education for Teaching26(3), 313.‏
Hutchins, R. M. (1968). The learning society. London: Pall Mall Press.
iEARN International Education and Resource Network. (2005). found on http://www.iearn.org/projects/index.html
Illich, H. (1973). Deschooling society. Harmondsworth UK: penguin. 20-104. 
Jarvis, P. (2008). Globalization, lifelong learning and the learning society. London and New York: Rotledge.
Knapper, Ch., Croply, A. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
LILARA project. (2006). details from University of Stirling Centre for Research into Lifelong Learning, Airthrey Castle, Stirling
Longworth, N. (2000). Making Lifelong Learning Work: Learning Cities for a Learning Century.Kogan Page Limited.London.uk.
Longworth, N. (2000). Towards a European Learning Society (TELS). Project Report presented to the European Commission November 2000. Also available [online] www.longlearn.org.uk
Longworth, N. (2006). Learning cities, learning regions, learning communities: Lifelong learning and local government. London: Routledge.
Longworth, N. (2011). Norman Longworth on Learning Cities. www.longlearn.org.uk
Jain, M. (2005). Shikshantar: The Peoples' Institute for Rethinking Education and Development. Journal of Futures Studies10(1), 115-118.‏
Longworth, N., Davies, W. K. (1996). Lifelong Learning: New Vision, New Implications, New Roles for People, Organizations, Nations and Communities in the 21st Century. Kogan Page Limited, 120 Pentonville Rd., London N1 9JN, England, United Kingdom
Morgan, B. (2002). Higher education and regional economic development in Wales: an opportunity for demonstrating the efficacy of devolution in economic development. Regional Studies36(1), 65-73.‏
OECD (2007). Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged – Higher Education and Regions. Paris: OECD.
PASCAL International Observatory. (2014) .Learning Cities: the Role of the ‘Region–intensive’ University”.
Parhizkar, A and Firouzbakht, A. (2012). Iran's urban management perspective with emphasis on urban sustainable development. Geographical Journal of Territory, 8 (32), 43-66.
Ranson, S. (1998). Toward a learning society. New York: Cassell.
UNESCO, U. (2015). UNESCO Global Network of Learning Cities: Guiding Documents. Hamburg: UNESCO UIL. Retrieved July13, 2017.‏
Unesco. (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. New York: Unesco.
Van Der Zee, H. (2006). 20 The learning society. From Adult Education to the Learning Society: 21 Years from the International Journal of Lifelong Education, 331