A Model of dynamics group among university departments: Grounded Theory Approach

Document Type : research article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Higher Education Management, Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University of Tehran.

2 Professor, Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran..

Abstract

The present study seeks to provide a pattern for group dynamics of departments of Kurdistan University. The research method was qualitative and grounded theory approach (systematic approach) was applied. Purposive sampling method and grounded theory systematic approach were used in this research. Participants were selected based on the rule and principle of theoretical saturation and included 28 faculty members and heads of departments of Kurdistan University. Data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA 12 software in three stages of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. Data validation was performed through verification method done by participants.
The data coding results consisted of 33 general categories, which were compiled and presented at the university in the form of a paradigm model including the following: causal conditions , central phenomenon ,contextual conditions (governing context), mediating or intervening conditions and group dynamics consequences ers; organizational agility and higher education system.

Keywords


Extended Abstract

1-Introduction

These institutes are the foundation and supplier of the desired workforces of other organizations. In order for universities to be able to play their function in the development and progress of the country well, they need prerequisites and requirements of having specialized, committed and dynamic human resources. Therefore, higher education is a highly significant institution in third world countries, both in terms of educating the elite and creating a basis for a society with technology and dynamism, and being the most important intellectual institution that has a great impact on culture, politics and beliefs (Gholami, 2015). One of the most important and influential part in the management of universities is the management of academic departments. Heads of departments are the link between the specialized subsystem of the university and its management subsystem. Hence, they have a particular function in achieving the goals of the university, and higher education centers are directly related to the effectiveness of heads of departments (Birnbaum, 1983).

Regarding the problems and issues of university departments, it can be argued that empirical evidence (Soleimani, 2008., Mohseni Tabrizi et al., 2010, Nadi, 2012) suggest that resistance is felt against group activity in the departments due to individualism among members. For example, in group work, the success of individual is less considered into his personal account and that the culture of individualism dominates the culture of collectivism in the mind of department members. We can also refer to the employment of faculty members in different fields and diverse university centers, which take the opportunity to focus on the activities of the main group. (Soleimani, 2004).

As a result, recognizing group dynamics is essential for heads of departments who deal with human groups, and provides them with valuable information. The related findings provide a solution to the problems in higher education and helps the heads of departments them to do necessary affairs in a better and easier way by the synergy in academic departments. Also, by creating the grounds for participation of faculty members, it improves communication and, considering the satisfaction of some of their spiritual needs, in addition to their job satisfaction, a dynamic and active environment for advancement is provided for achieving higher education goals. According to what was mentioned above, the ultimate objective of this study is to identify the components of group dynamics that affect the members of departments (heads of department, faculty members) and design an appropriate group dynamics model. By this model, it is possible to recognize factors for increasing mutual cooperation, sense of shared responsibility, tendency to similar social institutions, gaining experience and teamwork, particularly in the field of university management. Also by improving the teamwork process, possible consequences of individualism such as tension, conflict and strife could be avoided, and by considering the dynamics of group in the academic community, a suitable academic model could be provided.

2-Method:

The present study was conducted within the framework of a qualitative approach and grounded theory method (systematic approach). Participants in this study were selected based on the rule and principle of theoretical saturation. 28 faculty members and heads of departments of Kurdistan University were selected by purposive sampling. Data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA 12 software in three stages of open coding, axial coding and selective coding.

3-Findings:

The main unit of analysis for open coding included concepts. In the axial coding phase, transcripts of interviews were reviewed regularly to find main categories and subcategories. During this coding process, 642 open codes (concepts) and 32 categories were extracted and their characteristics were identified. which were compiled and presented at the university in the form of a paradigm model including the following: causal conditions (head of department’s feeling the need for change; structural reconstruction of the department and the higher education system; leadership style of the head of department; goals, vision and mission of the department; creative conflicts of the department; collaborative interactions of faculty members, self-regulation and self-renewal of faculty members), central phenomenon (faculty members’ social action; common goals and aspirations of faculty members; faculty members’ tendency to change; faculty members’ collective efficiency), contextual conditions (governing context) (Organizational support of heads of department; group synergy of university organizational culture; department flexibility; university organizational structure), dynamic strategies of university departments (improvement of heads of departments; direction and guidance of department; excellence of thoughts and ideas of department members; promoting the social responsibility of faculty members; transformational and transcendental culture of heads of departments; social facilitation of teamwork in the department), mediating or intervening conditions (Administrative procedures of the university, personality characteristics of heads of departments, decision-making style of heads of departments, structural changes of departments, organizational commitment and trust of the members of departments) and group dynamics consequences (quality and effectiveness of the university; creation of active educational groups; strengthening group leadership; maturity and professional development of faculty members; organizational agility and higher education system).

4-Conclusion:

The aim of the present research was to design a group dynamics model of university departments. The results indicated the extraction of 32 general categories (indicators) which were classified as a paradigm model in the form of six comprehensive categories: 1) causal conditions, 2) central phenomena, 3) group dynamics strategies 4) contextual conditions 4) intervening conditions and 6) the consequences of group dynamics which reflect the process of group dynamics of university departments.

Group dynamics is an emerging phenomena within the higher education system that calls for change. A dynamic university department should include a climate within which, students and other group members feel well and know how to find all the necessary learning resources. Students should feel welcomed, encouraged and supported. Faculty members should always model communication strategies that they want their students to use with their peers. This training should be dynamic and the discussion between students and faculty members should be both valid and valuable and be aimed at creating group dynamism between group members and heads of departments in universities (McDaniels et al, 2016).

5-Funding

There is no funding support

6-Authors' contribution:

Abdollah rahimi has planned the general framework of the project, then implemented the project, analyzed the findings and reported the results, and also has the task of submitting the article and correction. Dr. Bijan Abdollahi has collaborated as the guide in developing a theoretical framework, analysis and final conclusions. , and the author is responsible.  Dr. Hassanreza Zeinabadi and Dr. Hossein Abbasian as the First and second advisor professor was in charge of guiding the overall research process. Discussion of findings, review and approval of the final version is approved by the authors.

7-Conflict of interest:

 Authors declared no conflict of interest

8-Acknowledgments

Thanks and appreciation are offered to all colleagues and researchers who helped us with this article.

  • Abdullahi, B., Nave Ibrahim, A. (2007). empowering employees. Tehran; Publication of editing.
  • Abedian, A. (2011). Designing the competency model of department managers of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Thesis for obtaining a master's degree in educational management unpublished, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. ]in persian[
  • Amin Mozaffari, F., Yousefi Aqdam, R. (2014). Factors affecting the role of department heads: A case study of Tabriz University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education; 20 (2): 143-165. . ]in persian[
  • Arashpour,M. Lamborn,J. Farzanehfar, P. (2019). Group Dynamics in Higher Education: Impacts of Gender Inclusiveness and Selection Interventions on Collaborative Learning, Claiming Identity through Redefined Teaching in Construction Programs, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8452-0.ch003
  • Arasteh, H. (2001). Management in universities affiliated with the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, challenges and shortcomings. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education; 7 (3): 41-7. . ]in persian[
  • Bazargan, A. (2019). Introduction to Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods: Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences, Tehran: Didar Publishing. . ]in persian[
  • Berko, R.,Wolvin, D.,Wolvin, A. (2014). Communication Management. (Translated by Seyed Mohammad Arabi and Davood Izadi). Tehran: Cultural Research Office. . ]in persian[
  • Birnbaum, R. (2003). How Universities Work, Scientific Organization and Its Leadership from a Cybernetic Perspective, Translated by Hamid Reza Arasteh, Tehran: Higher Education Research and Planning Institute. . ]in persian[
  • Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E., & Lane, I. (2019). From the ground up: building a system-wide professional development and support program for academic department chairs. Studies in Higher Education, 44(3), 571-583.‏
  • Bystydzienski, J., Thomas, N., Howe, S., & Desai, A. (2017). The leadership role of college deans and department chairs in academic culture change. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2301-2315.‏
  • Carroll, J. B., & Wolverton, M. (2004). Who Becomes a Chair?. New Directions for Higher Education, 126, 3-10.‏
  • Cervino, D. J. (2018). Department chairs' research-related roles and responsibilities at a public research university (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama Libraries).‏
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Inc.
  • Eager, J. (2011). Development of leadership skills in community college department chairs. The Community College Enterprise, 17(2), 46-60.‏
  • Evans, A., & Chun, E. (2015). Department chairs as transformational diversity leaders. The Department Chair, 25(3), 1-3.‏
  • Ezzati, M. (2012). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Educational Performance of Academic Departments: Qualitative Study, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. Sixty-Five, 235-45. ]in persian[
  • Farahbakhsh, S. (2012). Human relations management of educational organizations. Tehran: Ayizh Publishing. ]in persian[
  • Farastkhah, M. (2016). Research method in social sciences with emphasis on grounded theory (GTM ground theory), Tehran: Agah Publishing. ]in persian[
  • Forsyth, D.R. (2019). Group Dynamics. University Of Richmond, Seventh edition, Cengage, Printed in the United States of America.
  • Gardner, S. K., & Ward, K. (2018). Investing in Department Chairs. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(2), 58-62.‏
  • Gencer, H.(2019). Group Dynamics and Behaviour, Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(1): 223-229. 
  • Gentry, C.R. (2014) Group dynamics among physical educators and principals in blue ribbon schools.  Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Kinesiology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Gholami, A. (2005). Investigating the situation of Sama organization of Islamic Azad University based on the components of Peter Singh model learning organization. ]in persian[
  • Greenlee, B. J., & Karanxha, Z. (2010). A study of group dynamics in educational leadership cohort and non-cohort groups. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(11), 357-382.
  • Hecht, I. W., Higgerson, M. L., Gmelch, W. H., & Tucker, A. (1999). Roles and responsibilities of department chairs. The department chair as academic leader, 1-17.‏
  • Heiskanen, M. (2012). Development of Group Dynamics and Cultural Competences in a Multicultural Study Group, Diaconia University of Applied Sciences.
  • Hejazi, A., Arasteh, H. (2012). Identifying and analyzing the role of educational, research and social services components on the productivity of university faculty members (Case study of Kharazmi University faculty members). Management in Islamic University, 1 (4): 669-686. ]in persian[
  • Hersh, W.,Weber, L. (2002). Challenges of higher education processing in the third millennium. Translated by the Department of Translators, Tehran Imam Hossein University Press. ]in persian[
  • Hirvonen, P. (2019).  Understanding Small Group Dynamics Through Positioning Theory, Papers on Social Representations,28(1):3.1-3.12.
  • Jafari, P., Arasteh, H., Shahmiri, M., Rahgozar, M. (2013). Model for Improving the Effectiveness of Managers of Departments of Universities and Higher Education Centers (Case Study of Islamic Azad University), Quarterly Journal of Welfare Planning and Social Development, 4 (14), 209-250. ]in persian[
  • Jones, F. R. (2011). Future Competencies of Department Chairs: A Human Resources Perspective.‏
  • Kapur, R. (2018). Roles and Responsibilities of Academic Managers – Heads of Departments/Schools.
  • Karimi, N., Rajaipour, S., Nave Ibrahim, A. (2018). Design and validation of a task-oriented performance evaluation model for the department manager. Journal of New Approach in Educational Management. Ninth Year, No. 1, Spring 97, consecutive 33. pp. 191-328. ]in persian[
  • Kelbaugh, B. M. (2003). Exploration of teamwork in Extension: Identifying indicators of success using a modified Delphi study (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).‏
  • Khavari, M. (2012). A Comparative Study of the Relationship between Positive Emotion - Negative Emotion and the Performance of Departments at the University of Isfahan and Kabul University. Master Thesis. ]in persian[
  • Levi, D. (2014). Group dynamics for teams. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Levi, D., & Askay, D. A. (2020). Group dynamics for teams. Sage Publications.‏
  • Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997- 2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476.
  • Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997- 2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476.
  • McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating dynamic learning communities in synchronous online courses: One approach from the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL). Online Learning, 20(1), 110-12
  • McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating dynamic learning communities in synchronous online courses: One approach from the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL). Online Learning, 20(1), 110-12
  • McEwan, D., Ruissen, G. R., Eys, M. A., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2017). The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PloS one, 12(1).‏
  • Mehr Alizadeh, Y. (2005). Globalization, Organizational Change, and Human Resource Development Planning, Ahwaz: Ahwaz University Press. ]in persian[
  • Miller, M. T. (1999). The department chair as speaker of the house: Shared authority in the community college department. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 23(8), 739-746.‏
  • Mokhtaripour, M., Siadat, Seyed A. (2004). Investigating the effect and duties of department heads on the efficiency of faculty members of the University of Isfahan from the perspective of faculty members. Management Knowledge Quarterly (Not Publish), 17 (3), 90-71. ]in persian[
  • Nadi, M. (2012). Team building in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (case study), Master Thesis, Educational Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. ]in persian[
  • Naveenan, R.V. & Kumar, R. (2018).  Impact of Group Dynamics on Team,  American International Journal of Social Science Research,2(2): 16-23.
  • Nunes, F. C., Farinha, M. G., Barbosa, M. A., Caixeta, C. C., Costa, A. P., & Silva, N. D. S. (2021). The use of narrative research for the learning of group dynamics by professionals from Psychosocial Care Centers. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 55.
  • Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2011). Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 153-164.‏

 

  • Polychronopoulos, G. B. (2021). Applying the RARE Model to General Education Assessment: Working Collaboratively with Multidisciplinary Groups of Faculty.
  • Rasker, P. C., Post, W. M., & Schraagen, J. M. C. (2000). Effects of two types of intrateam feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1167-1189
  • Rasker, P. C., Post, W. M., & Schraagen, J. M. C. (2000). Effects of two types of intrateam feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1167-1189
  • Rossmann,D (2010), Understanding Organizational Culture and Group Dynamics: Reframing the Normative Orientation of the Role of Information Professionals within Organizations, Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
  • Russ-Eft, D. (2011). A typology of training design and work environment factors affecting workplace learning and transfer, Human Resource Development Review, 1, 45–65.
  • Rutan, J.S. Stone, W.N. & Shay, J.J. (2007) Group Dynamics and Group Development Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy, Fourth Edition.
  • Safari Farfar, R., Abolghasemi, M., Farastkhah, M., Nave Ibrahim, A. (2018). Designing a conceptual framework for ranking the departments of Iranian public universities. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 8 (21), 225-191. ]in persian[
  • Sanyal, S., & Hisam, M. W. (2018). The impact of teamwork on work performance of employees: A study of faculty members in Dhofar University. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(3), 15-22.‏
  • Schruijer, S. G. (2021). Whatever happened to group dynamics in the scientific study of groups?. Team Performance Management: An International Journal.
  • Seagren, A. T., Creswell, J. W., & Wheeler, D. W. (1993). The department chair: New roles, responsibilities and challenges.‏ ERIC Digest, pp1-6.
  • Shaban., M. (2015). Sociological analysis of scientific cooperation and group dynamics among professors of social sciences (case study of faculty members of Tehran universities, Tarbiat Modares, Allameh, Beheshti, Tarbiat Moallem, Al-Zahr). Master Thesis. ]in persian[
  • Shafi'abadi, A. (2018). Group Dynamics and Group Counseling, Tehran: Roshd Publications. ]in persian[
  • Soleimani, N. (2008). Study of team activity indices in university departments, Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Second Year, 3, 74-53. ]in persian[
  • Suleimani, N. (2004). Leadership and team performance of educational groups is a key factor in improving the quality of higher education. Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Quality Components in Higher Education. Islamic Azad University, Roodehen Branch. ]in persian[
  • Waseqi, A. (2000). Investigating the dynamics of groups in three types of high schools with normative, personal and exchange leadership styles, Master Thesis, Sari Public Management Center. ]in persian[
  • Wazzan, M. M. (2015). Group dynamics in the EFL classroom: The role of the cohesive group of Syrian tertiary learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 184-188.‏
  • Wolodko, K.R. (2017). The Emergence of Group Dynamics from Contextualised Social Processes: A Complexity- Oriented Grounded-Theory Approach. For the award of Doctor of Philosophy. University of New England.
  • Wolverton, M., Ackerman, R., & Holt, S. (2005). Preparing for leadership: What academic department chairs need to know. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 227-238.
  • Zarei Matin, H. (2016). Advanced Organizational Behavior Management: Tehran, Ad Publishing. ]in persian[